Free guide
Comparison of Advisor Models
RIA, IBD, and wirehouse models compared on independence, compliance, economics, and operational reality.
What's inside
Most comparisons of advisor models stop at payout percentages. This one doesn't. We line up RIA, IBD, and wirehouse on the dimensions that actually matter five years in: who owns the book, what the platform bundles and what you choose, who owns compliance under each model, and what the real operational lift looks like.
- Ownership and enterprise value, model by model
- Platform and technology: what is bundled, what you choose
- Who owns compliance in each model
- The operational reality: what you take on, what you offload
We'll email it to you as soon as you submit (in Gmail, check the Promotions tab).
Five chassis, one practice
Every affiliation model answers the same four questions differently: who employs you, who owns the client relationship on paper, who bears compliance, and who keeps how much of the revenue. Wirehouses and banks trade the deepest platforms for the tightest grids and firm-owned paper. Regionals soften the culture inside the same employee model. Independent broker-dealers hand you the practice as a 1099 business with compliance rails attached. Hybrid RIAs split advisory economics from the commission tail. A full RIA gives you everything, including every responsibility.
The rows that actually decide it
Payout is the least decision-relevant comparison, because it prices services you either consume or replace. The rows that change lives are ownership, which determines whether you are building enterprise value or a deferred-comp balance, and compliance, which determines your daily autonomy. Four facts predict the right chassis better than any preference quiz: your advisory share, your trail revenue, your production level, and your exit horizon.
Common questions
What is the difference between a wirehouse, an IBD, and an RIA?+
At a wirehouse you are a W-2 employee on a payout grid set by production, and the client agreement is with the firm. At an independent broker-dealer you run your practice as a 1099 contractor, on terms your broker-dealer agreement sets, with a headline payout that can reach 95% and above and nets in the 80s in our deals after the broker-dealer's own charges, depending on the advisor and the book. As an RIA owner you keep 100% of revenue minus real operating costs, carry compliance yourself, and own a business that trades as an enterprise.Which advisor model pays the most?+
Stated payouts mislead: in the deals we work on, an IBD's headline payout can reach 95% and above, and nets in the 80s after the broker-dealer's own charges, before the practice pays for its office and staff, depending on the advisor, the broker-dealer, the business mix, the advisory size and the book, and an RIA's 100% arrives before real operating costs, which run higher with a larger staff or lease. The economically honest comparison is what you keep of what clients actually pay, plus the enterprise value the model lets you build, which is where owned models decisively win.What is a hybrid RIA and who should consider one?+
A hybrid pairs your own RIA for advisory business with a friendly broker-dealer for commission business, usually because annuity and fund trails cannot follow into an RIA-only model. It fits practices in transition and books with meaningful trail revenue, at the cost of answering to two regulators.
Flagship research
The full picture lives in The State of Advisor Movement.
Six months of measured advisor movement: the firm-by-firm ledger, destination channels, deal economics, and the rent-or-own framework, in an interactive edition and a 41-page print edition. Both free.